As reported on Joystiq Richard Leadbetter Ã¢â‚¬â€œ Director of HD consultancy Digital Foundry and author of Eurogamer’s multiplatform comparison Face-off features Ã¢â‚¬â€œ tweeted that playing Ghostbusters on the PS3 was like “time-warping back to the dawn of PS3 development.” Which sucks Ã‚Â considering the high hopes Terminal Reality developers of the just released Ghostbusters game Ã‚Â have for their multiplatform Infernal Engine.
The net is flooded with reports of a less than stellar PS3 version of the title originated at Lens of Truth on Monday, were later corroborated by Gamezine.co.uk and, following tomorrow’s publication of Leadbetter’s most recent Face-off feature, will be further corroborated by Eurogamer. Confusing the issue even further is the following quote from Terminal Reality’s Mark Randel, who told VG247 last year, “We’re one of the few developers who love the PS3 and have a great time with it. We have great technology for the PS3 and we want to show it off.”
Terminal Reality Ã‚Â commented on the controversy. A spokesperson for the developer said, “For the record, the PS3 version [of Ghostbusters] is softer due to the ‘quincunx’ antialiasing filter and the fact we render at about 75% the resolution of the 360 version. So you cannot directly compare a screen shot of one to the other unless you scale them properly. The PS3 does have less available RAM than the 360 Ã¢â‚¬â€œ but we managed to squeeze 3 out of 4 textures as full size on the PS3.”
So whatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the issue? is the PS3 RAM “maxed out”? Or is Terminal Reality’s engine Ã¢â‚¬â€œ despite comments to the contrary Ã¢â‚¬â€œ just not up to snuff on the PS3? With most recent multiplatform titles performing comparably, if not identically, on both the Xbox 360 and PS3 consolesÃ‚Â PS3 games are routinely outperformed by their Xbox 360 counterparts. To add more irony to the situation Ghostbusters‘ the gameÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s exclusive European publisher is Sony and Ghostbusters franchise’s owner is of course Sony Pictures.